Contract and advisory · remote from New Zealand · any cloud or model stack
I keep AI agents stable, governed and secure in production, and I give an independent read on agent systems other people built. The method took an estate serving 3,000 corporate customers to agents closing 15% of incidents with no person in the loop, safely: low-severity incidents, through runbooks the team kept improving. Agents write the code; I write the harnesses, evaluations and guardrails that decide whether it ships.
If instead you are one person building a company that agents will run, and nothing exists yet, the last section is for you.
An independent read on an agent system you built or were sold.
What your agents and models are actually doing, and where the effort should go.
Make trust in agents explicit, graded, and able to grow.
Know your AI attack surface, and close it faster than it opens.
An improvement loop tuned to how your company actually runs and makes money.
You hand me a defined problem; I take it away and return a result with the evidence and the next step. Typically two to six weeks. Fixed price.
I join your team for a fixed period, work inside your systems, and leave the capability with your engineers. Typically six to twelve weeks. Day rate.
One or two days a week steering your platform or AI effort, without hiring a full-time head before you need one. Monthly, three-month minimum.
It is me doing the work, not a team I hand it to. I work remote from New Zealand and keep overlap hours with your time zone; for US and European teams that means early mornings and late evenings on my side, agreed up front.
If you are one person with an idea for a company where agents do the operating and you hold the direction, nothing is breaking yet, and the offers above are not for you. This one is.
What goes wrong in a one-person company is the same thing that goes wrong in a 300-person one, earlier: nobody can say which work the agents are trusted on, the agents forget what they learned last week, and the one human becomes the bottleneck for every decision. Those are problem 1, problem 4 and problem 7 on the research page. The engagement brings twenty years of operating judgement to them now; the research covers them once problems 1 to 3 have results.
The engagement is a scoped one: three to four weeks, fixed price. Deliverable: an operating model for your company. Which functions agents hold and which you hold; how trust is graded and expanded as the record builds; the interface where your judgement enters cheaply and binds; and what must never be forgotten. You leave with a design you can build against. If you want me to stay on while you build it, that is the fractional shape above.
The same engagement applies to an existing service you want to re-deliver with agents running it end to end.
Tell me what you want agents to runSelf-reported results from the estate I ran, delivered by the team I led; not independently audited.
Until October 2026 I led platform engineering for a business-intelligence SaaS, running the entire production estate for 3,000 corporate customers and 45,000 daily users: 30 cloud accounts, six Kubernetes clusters, four database engines, identity, observability, disaster recovery and the AI serving layer, with a six-person senior team and a $3M budget. The remediation agents act only through scoped tools and managed runbooks; destructive operations are out of their reach. When a self-propagating worm hit the AI package ecosystem, the standing controls, entry-point scanning and an allow-list enforced through a local proxy, contained it.
Before that: Kubernetes and AI operations at a global accounting platform, including a cross-model incident operator; five years of site reliability at 4,000 deployments a year for a board-governance platform; an eleven-engineer platform team for six embedded radio product lines; internal platform tooling at a global bank. Twenty years across business intelligence, financial software, board governance, embedded hardware and banking.
My independent research, on what a production agent should keep and forget, is at gehanpanapitiya.com. Engagements are where those problems get met in other people's systems; nothing observed inside a client's system becomes research data without written agreement.
Earlier recognition: gold medal, National Best Quality Software Awards (NBQSA), 2008; special recognition, Asia Pacific ICT Alliance Awards (APICTA), 2008; Microsoft Excellence Award, 2009; silver, Microsoft Imagine Cup, 2007.
Tell me what is breaking, or what you want agents to run. I reply within one working day, New Zealand time, and the first conversation is free.
Email request@gehanpanapitiya.comOr message me on LinkedIn.